Geochemical signature of Ordovician Mn-rich sedimentary rocks on the Avalonian shelf
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mn-rich (3.26–15.6 wt.% MnO) sedimentary layers (coticules, Strohschiefer) occur in Ordovician siliciclastic sedimentary rocks that were deposited on the Avalonian shelf and subsequently metamorphosed between 340 and 380 Ma. The Mn-rich layers formed during periods of restricted clastic input, when Mn concentrated by a redox-controlled dissolution–precipitation process near the sediment–water interface, comparable to recent Mn-crusts in the boreal settings of the Baltic Sea, the Barents Sea, and the Kara Sea. Enhanced clastic sedimentation brought the process to a halt and buried the Mn-rich layers. Formation of Mn-rich layers resumed upon renewed reduction in clastic input. Nd and Sr isotope data exclude a volcanic or hydrothermal derivation of Mn. Instead, Mn input occurred via rivers from the continental crust. The Nd isotopic composition and geochemical fingerprints of Mn-rich and hosting Mn-poor sedimentary rocks suggests that the clastic input was dominated by material derived from Gondwana rather than from Avalonia. The occurrence of coticules, however, seems to be restricted to the Avalonian shelf.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".