MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1817050172 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2004.1328157

A 2.4 GHz CMOS quadrature LC-oscillator/mixer

2004· article· en· W1817050172 on OpenAlex
Luís B. Oliveira, Jorge Fernandes, I.M. Filanovsky, C.J.M. Verhoeven

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase noiseColpitts oscillatorQuadrature (astronomy)ResonatorLocal oscillatorOscillation (cell signaling)Electronic oscillatorVackář oscillatorQ factorCMOSElectronic engineeringOscillator phase noiseInductorVariable-frequency oscillatorVoltage-controlled oscillatorDegradation (telecommunications)PhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageNoise figureAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coupled LC oscillators are very often used to achieve quadrature outputs. In this paper we present an expression for the oscillation frequency of a coupled oscillator considering the effect of mismatches. Then we calculate the new value of the resonator effective Q due to varying of the oscillation frequency, and we evaluate the correspondent phase noise degradation. We show that this degradation is critical for high quality factor inductors. We evaluate the capability of a coupled LC oscillator to perform the mixing function by inserting a signal in the oscillator feedback structure. The theoretical results are confirmed by simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207