MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W181776633 · doi:10.1093/pch/13.5.387a

Case 2: Hyponatremia and hyperkalemia in a four-week-old boy

2008· article· en· W181776633 on OpenAlexaff
MB Peddle, G Joubert, Richard Lim

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperkalemiaHyponatremiaMedicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A four-week-old male infant presented to the emergency department with failure to thrive (360 g below his birth weight), and had a history of poor eating, increased sleeping and irritability over his first month of life. The infant's family history was significant for polycystic kidney disease in his mother and female relatives. On presentation, his blood pressure was 102/74 mmHg, heart rate was 162 beats/min, respiratory rate was 52 breaths/min, oxygen saturation was 99% and rectal temperature was elevated at 39.4°C. A physical examination revealed a somewhat wasted, nondysmorphic, nontoxic baby with normal male genitalia. The rest of the physical examination was essentially normal. The infant's bloodwork showed a a sodium concentration of 121 mmol/L, and a potassium concentration of 7.1 mmol/L. (The tests were repeated and found to be accurate.) Capillary gases showed a pH of 7.32, bicarbonate of 13 mmol/L and PCO2 of 26 mmHg. An electrocardiogram was performed, which did not show any abnormalities. His urine test was positive for blood and leukocytes, but negative for nitrites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207