Une méthode de recueil de la parenté dans les enquêtes démographiques : un compromis avec l’approche anthropologique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La collecte des biographies par l'intermédiaire d'une enquête rétrospective permet de recueillir différentes informations sur les origmes familiales de l'enquêté, sur l'intervention de la parenté au cours des changements résidentiels et professionnels, et sur l'évolution de sa situation familiale (vie matrimoniale et devenir des enfants). Nous présentons ici la solution retenue pour saisir la parenté aussi bien par rapport à une tierce personne qu'au sein du ménage, et les possibilités d'analyse offertes à partir d'exemples tirés de l'étude IFAN-ORSTOM menée à Dakar. Notre analyse suggère que la crise conforte la dépendance des plus jeunes envers les aînés. Le mode de vie urbain ne semble pas, à Dakar, être un facteur de déstructuration des familles. C'est pour l'instant la solidarité familiale qui sert d'amortisseur aux conséquences de la crise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.071 | 0.119 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".