Youth Livelihoods and Poverty in the Beetham Neighbourhood East Port of Spain Trinidad
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article seeks to answer the questions as to what poverty means for the livelihoods of young people living in the Beetham Gardens, and how they deal with this phenomenon. The framework along which the author analyses the lives of the youths in the Beetham, the livelihood approach, is briefly discussed in the first section. Subsequently describes how poverty interrelates with the opportunities and constraints of the youths with respect to their access to different resources or 'capitals', a vital concept in the livelihood approach. The article illustrates the young people's views on their situation, in the section their perceptions on their own poverty. The article concludes by a final discussion concerning the impact of poverty on the livelihoods of the youthful population and their different strategies towards dealing with different aspects of it. To demonstrate how poverty can affect the lives of young people in poor urban areas, presents two interviews with respondents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it