MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W181949111

Teaching the Literatures of Early America

2000· article· en· W181949111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vernetta Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueStyle · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Humor Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousLiterary criticismHistorySociologyAmerican studiesAmerican literaturePromotion (chess)FifteenthMythologyLiteratureClassicsLawPolitical sciencePoliticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carla Mulford, ed. Teaching Literatures of Early New York: Modern Language Association, 1999. xii + 402 pp. $40 cloth; $22 paper. Fulfilling its professional responsibility to prepare and showcase enlightened scholars, especially those freshly arriving in literary studies profession, Modern Language Association has established a series of resource books entitled Options for Teaching. Begun in 1975, series targets literary categories in areas of composition, film studies, oral traditions, and contemporary theory. The concentration on specialized literary topics furnishes instructors with opportunities for deeper, more diverse study in increasingly competitive arena of academic hiring, promotion, and tenure. The fifteenth volume of series highlights an area of American receiving renewed attention from literary critics. Contemporary critical approaches to and history addressing issues of race, class, and gender have prompted educators to revise their definitions, portrayals, and understanding of early years of North America after European settlement and that describes it. This reexamination of America's years entails challenging version of American history often depicted in traditional early-American studies. Consequently, instructors are expanding, replacing, supplementing longstanding mythologies embedded in this that traces development of United States, its relationship to other North American countries, and its interaction with indigenous peoples and with non-English colonists. For decades, educators have struggled with defining words literature and America. These two terms become even more enigmatic when they converge in a course that explores body of recognized as documenting creation of a nation. Students have been overeducated in that records explorations of Columbus, establishment of Puritans at Plymouth Plantation, and subsequent colonization of uncivilized, barbarous Indians that led to emergence of founding fathers. The recent confirmation, however, of Thomas Jefferson's romantic involvement with his slave Sally Hemmings attests that formation of United States was not simple, linear progression from discovery to nationhood often presented in American literature. These documented interactions also counter projection of a superior European race that was responsible for elevating subhuman ideas and customs of native North Americans. Confronting these complex exchanges in colonial culture, literary scholars are now exploring works that span spectrum of North American colonial writing. While editor Carla Mulford admits that Teaching Literature of Early America does not reflect the full range of colonial writing, she asserts that text expands present scope, definitions, and categories of early American literature. For example, collection includes territory of Caribbean islands and presentday Canada. In addition, it addresses literary genres beyond traditional classifications of poetry, fiction, and autobiography. Therefore, collection's portrayal of early America is more representative of early American perioda period when society lacked rigid geographical boundaries, literary classifications, and cultural divisions facilitated by formation of United States of This collection combats presentism by supplying instructors with methods and resources required to expose students to abundant quantity of early American and to situate them in multifaceted culture of colonial times. A number of literary educators have been introducing students to various literary works represented by Jesuit captivity narratives, female Spanish explorers, Native American narrative forms, and also to concept of social role of saloons and clubs in British colonies. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStyleSame topicAmerican Literature and Humor StudiesFrench-language works237,207