MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Muscle Specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis Patients (P2.089)

2014· article· en· W1819528518 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Pakzad, Ebrima Gibbs, Tariq Aziz, Joël Oger

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyasthenia gravisAntibodyTyrosine kinaseMedicineBiosensorChemistryInternal medicineImmunologyBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To optimize and validate a biosensor (Biacore™) assay for the detection of muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. BACKGROUND: MG is an antibody-mediated autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction, characterized by skeletal muscle weakness and fatiguability. 85-90% of MG patients have antibodies targeting the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), while a smaller proportion has autoantibodies targeting MuSK, an AChR-clustering molecule. Biacore™, a label-free biosensor, utilizes surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to detect biomolecular interactions in real-time. DESIGN/METHODS: MuSK was immobilized onto Biacore™ 3000 sensor chips and diluted sera sequentially injected over the surface. Assay conditions were optimized by studying the binding of 20 healthy control, 10 MuSK antibody-negative, and 10 MuSK antibody-positive sera (reference assay Prof. Angela Vincent, Oxford, UK). We used different MuSK immobilization densities: low (300RU), medium (1200RU), and high (4500RU). An initial screen on a high-density MuSK surface was performed on 120 sera, consisting of 73 AChR antibody-negative, 31 normal healthy control and 16 non-healthy control (multiple sclerosis patients). Intra- and inter-assay variations were determined by calculating % coefficient of variation (%CV). RESULTS: Using a cut-off of mean+3SD of 20 healthy controls on the high density MuSK surface (4500RU), all healthy control and Oxford-tested MuSK-negative samples tested negative, while all 10 Oxford-tested MuSK-positive samples tested positive. Similar results were obtained using the medium density surface (1200RU), however the sensitivity of the assay decreased with a lower surface density (300RU). The assay was found to be highly reproducible, with intra-assay %CVs <10% and inter-assay %CVs <15%. Of the 120 sera screened, 24/73 AChR antibody-negative sera tested positive for anti-MuSK antibodies, while all 16 MS and 31 healthy controls tested negative. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a rapid Biacore™-based assay for detecting anti-MuSK antibodies, with the assay time for each sample being approximately 7min. It is highly specific, sensitive and reproducible, and is being further validated and developed into a quantitative assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaFrench-language works237,207