MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1819694356 · doi:10.1002/cmr.a.21290

Image‐based method to measure and characterize shim‐induced eddy current fields

2013· article· en· W1819694356 on OpenAlex
Alex A. Bhogal, Maarten J. Versluis, Jos Koonen, Jeroen C.W. Siero, Vincent O. Boer, Dennis W. J. Klomp, Peter R. Luijten, Hans Hoogduin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConnaught FundUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsShim (computing)Measure (data warehouse)Eddy currentCurrent (fluid)AcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringData miningElectrical engineeringPsychologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Dynamic magnetic field shimming is gaining interest for field sensitive MRI acquisitions. Using slice based or real‐time shim updating, significant improvements in static field ( B 0 ) uniformity can be obtained. While the ability to rapidly switch shim fields can improve overall B 0 homogeneity, it induces eddy current fields that must be characterized and compensated for. Methods used to achieve this have thus far been based on linear projection spin echo sequences or field probe assemblies. Here, a novel image‐based method is presented to measure and characterize eddy current fields without the need for field probes or projection based measurements. This technique can be extended to characterize very high order spherical harmonic fields, making it a useful tool to calibrate next‐generation shim systems implementing dynamic field steering with greater than third order shim terms. Results are used to calibrate a Dynamic Shim Updating unit for pre‐emphasis and eddy current compensation. Three‐dimensional datasets are acquired at multiple MR facilities containing complete spatiotemporal field information to compensate eddy current field self‐ and cross‐terms for up to third order. Furthermore, simulation studies are performed to investigate the effect of scan resolution and phantom size with respect to accurate eddy current field characterization. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part A 42A: 245–260, 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it