MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1819874521 · doi:10.3368/npj.15.3.231

Using shade to propagate Canadian wild ginger (Asarum canadense L.) and other woodland forbs

2014· article· en· W1819874521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNative Plants Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWoodlandDeciduousBiologyGeographyForbPlant ecologyBotanyHabitatAgroforestryForestryEcologyGrassland

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian wild ginger (<i>Asarum canadense</i> L. [Aristolochiaceae]) is found in a variety of deciduous and moist coniferous forests throughout eastern Canada and the US. Because of the recalcitrant nature of <i>Asarum</i> seeds, we vegetatively propagate this species by divisions under natural shade at the Lake County Forest Preserve nursery in Illinois. This method yields plants suitable for outplanting in 3 y. We also use natural shade under established oak trees for native seed production, and an artificial shade bed system to produce 75 native woodland species found in the midwestern US.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it