MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1820662701 · doi:10.60543/rlcmv.v5i0.3015

REVISÃO CIENTÍFICO-LITERÁRIA DA RESOLUÇÃO DE PIÓMETRA POR OVARIOHISTERECTOMIA LAPAROSCÓPICA NUMA CADELA

2012· article· pt· W1820662701 on OpenAlexaff
Inês Alves, F. Collard, E. Viguier

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Medicine and Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uma fêmea da raça caniche de 15 anos com hiperadrenocorticismo, apresentou-se com descarga vulvar. Uma ecografia abdominal confirmou a existência de piómetra aberta. Foi executada uma ovariohisterectomia laparoscópica de forma a diminuir o local de incisão e limitar o risco de deiscência de sutura, frequentemente associada ao hiperadrenocorticismo. O tempo cirúrgico foi de 85 minutos e a cadela permaneceu no recobro por 3 horas sem complicações. A ovariectomia e ovariohisterectomia são frequentemente realizadas em fêmeas saudáveis, mas este procedimento também pode ser realizado em piómetras abertas sem aumentar a taxa de complicações pós-cirúrgicas. Neste caso, ao optar por esta abordagem cirúrgica, sendo uma fêmea geriátrica, com excesso de peso e com paredes abdominais de baixa resistência, foram limitadas potenciais complicações. O objectivo desta revisão literário-científica é dar a conhecer a evolução da cirurgia minimamente invasiva ao nível da ovariohisterectomia e ovariectomia, dando a conhecer as inovações e novas abordagens da laparoscopia neste tema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Same topicVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207