MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1820809224 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.16284

Les intérêts diffus, instruments pour la justice et la démocratie environnementale

2015· article· fr· W1820809224 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alexandra Aragão

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour démontrer que le concept légal d’intérêts diffus est un instrument pour la justice et la démocratie environnementale, il faut tout d’abord le comprendre dans le contexte des fonctions sociales du procès judiciaire. Au-delà des intérêts individuels et de l’intérêt public, il existe dans certains systèmes juridiques, et en particulier dans celui des pays lusophones, une consécration des intérêts trans-individuels, dont les intérêts diffus sont une sous-catégorie. Le système d’action populaire est l’aboutissement de l’objectif de concrétisation de la protection des intérêts diffus sur le plan de la procédure juridictionnelle. La conséquence est une protection plus effective des droits environnementaux, à travers une représentation plus élargie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207