MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hedgehog signaling and congenital malformations

2004· review· en· W1821222874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Genetics · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSick Kids Foundation
KeywordsHedgehogBiologySignal transductionPhenotypeHedgehog signaling pathwayRepressorGeneticsCell biologyCongenital malformationsMutantActivator (genetics)ReceptorTranscription factorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hedgehog (Hh)-signaling pathway is essential for numerous developmental processes in Drosophila and vertebrate embryos. Hh signal transduction encompasses a complex series of regulatory events, including the generation of the mature Hh ligand, propagation of the ligand from source of production as well as the reception and interpretation of the signal in Hh-receiving cells. Many congenital malformations in humans are known to involve mutations in various components of the Hh-signaling pathway. This mini review summarizes some recent findings about the regulation of Hh signal transduction and describes the spectrum of human congenital malformations that are associated with aberrant Hh signaling. Based on a comparison of mouse-mutant phenotypes and human syndromes, we discuss how Hh-dependent Gli activator and repressor functions contribute to some of the congenital malformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it