MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1821756340 · doi:10.4000/tc.6306

Autorickshaw (1948- 2… )

2012· article· en· W1821756340 on OpenAlex
Yann Philippe Tastevin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechniques & culture · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsCollège de Maisonneuve
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

l'origine, le rickshaw est un tricycle propulsion humaine ou mcanique, destin au transport de personnes et de marchandises 1 . L'autorickshaw est la version motorise du pousse-pousse traditionnel. Tempo, Touk-touk, Trishaw, Rickshaw, Bajaj, Baby taxi dsignent, selon les modles, selon les pays, ce vhicule trois roues. Le tricycle moteur a t fabriqu grande chelle par Piaggio ds 1948. Depuis sa naissance officielle dans les ateliers de Pontedera, dans la rgion de Pise, le modle trois roues, l'Ape de l'industriel italien comporte une base de scooter Vespa : guidon et roue unique de direction l'avant ; un phare mont sur son carnage, une carrosserie portante en tle d'acier emboutie forme un chssis monocoque robuste ; un moteur deux temps, avec un diffrentiel intgr, propulse l'engin. Le rickshaw moteur peut tre dfini comme une innovation de produit, un driv de la Vespa mise sur le march en 1946 (Rapini 2008 : 72). Depuis, l'autorickshaw par sa robustesse et son adaptabilit, a connu diverses variations de longueur, de largeur, de hauteur, de technologie de propulsion, de confort et d'accessibilit. Il continue faire preuve d'une redoutable vitalit. Finalement, peu d'cosystmes urbains lui rsistent, et l o il circule son usage demeure irremplaable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it