MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

238. CCN1 Expression By Fibroblasts is Required for Bleomycin-Induced Skin Scleroderma

2015· article· en· W1821998548 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine Thompson, Andrew Leask

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBleomycinScleroderma (fungus)MorpheaDermatologySystemic sclerodermaPathologyInternal medicineDermatomyositisChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The cellular microenvironment is being increasingly appreciated as playing a key role in CTDs including scleroderma. Matricellular proteins, such as members of the CCN family (CCN1–6) play a key role in local modifications of cellular signalling and are dysregulated in fibrotic conditions including scleroderma. CCN2 (CTGF) has been shown to play a key role in skin biology and fibrosis; however, the role of CCN1 (cyr61) in these processes are unclear. Methods: We use fibroblast-specific CCN1 knockout mice (employing floxed CCN1 mice and a tamoxifen-dependent Cre recombinase expressed under the control of a fibroblast-specific collagen 1A2 promoter) and the bleomycin model of skin scleroderma to assess the potential role of CCN1 to skin connective tissue biology and fibrosis. Fibrosis is evaluated histologically using haematoxylin and eosin and trichrome stains, and molecularly using a collagen ELISA to detect insoluble and soluble collagen levels and real-time PCR analysis to assess messenger RNA (mRNA) expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207