Différences entre les niveaux de stress de parents d’enfants ayant ou non une DI ou un TSA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contexte. Les parents d’enfants ayant une DI ou un TSA rapportent généralement un stress plus élevé que les parents d’enfants à développement typique, ce qu’on a peu étudié au Québec. Méthode. Quatre groupes de 144 parents (ayant un enfant sans DI ni TSA; avec DI; avec TSA; avec DI et TSA) ont complété des mesures de stress parental, de soutien social et rapporté des informations concernant leur enfant. Résultats. Les analyses de variance et des contrastes prévus indiquent que les parents du groupe DI-TSA obtiennent les plus hauts niveaux de stress. Par ordre décroissant, viennent ensuite les groupes TSA, DI, et sans DI ou TSA. Les enfants du groupe DI-TSA présentent plus de comportements problématiques, de moins bonnes habiletés adaptatives et moins d’habiletés sociales. Leurs parents sont ceux qui reçoivent plus de soutien, mais également ceux qui en sont les moins satisfaits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".