MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prometheus Unbound: A Romantic Rewriting of a Classical Myth

2012· article· en· W1822371604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBorges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanticismMythologyPhilosophyHumanitiesInterpretation (philosophy)CriticismDramaArtLiteratureTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines Shelley’s merit in recreating a wellknown myth, which is adapted to fi t his philosophical and Romantic outlook. Inspired by the French Revolution, the revolutionary fervor of Shelley’s age should determine the interpretation of Prometheus Unbound as an advocacy of rebellion against all forms of tyrannical authority enslaving humans’ souls and minds and limiting their imagination and potential. In dramatizing Prometheus’s suffering and moral regeneration, Shelley suggests that rebellion is fi rst and foremost an internal act, in which an individual must take the full responsibility of reforming the self by rejecting submission to all forms of evil. In other words, Shelley seems to stress the autonomy of the individual’s will and its power in changing society. The ending of the play expresses Shelley’s apocalyptic vision of the world yet his belief in the promise of a new order initiated by man. Key words : Shelley; Prometheus Unbound; Romanticism; Myth; Drama; Criticism Resume Cet article examine le merite de Shelley a recreer un mythe bien connu, qui est concu pour s’adapter son point de vue philosophique et romantique. Inspire par la Revolution francaise, la ferveur revolutionnaire de l’âge de Shelley doit determiner l’interpretation de Prometheus Unbound comme un plaidoyer de rebellion contre toutes les formes de l’autorite tyrannique asservissement âmes des humains et les esprits et de limiter leur imagination et leur potentiel. En dramatisant les souffrances de Promethee et de la regeneration morale, Shelley suggere que la rebellion est d’abord et avant tout un acte interne, dans laquelle une personne doit prendre l’entiere responsabilite de la reforme de l’auto en rejetant la soumission a toutes les formes du mal. En d’autres termes, Shelley semble souligner l’autonomie de la volonte de l’individu et son pouvoir de changer la societe. La fi n de la piece exprime la vision apocalyptique de Shelley du monde encore sa croyance en la promesse d’un nouvel ordre lance par l’homme. Mots cles : Shelley; Prometheus Unbound; Le romantisme; Mythe; Drame; Critique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it