MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W182289913

More Talk, More Action: A Changing Role for Corporate Boards and CPAs

2005· article· en· W182289913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen M Kroll

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicRisk Management in Financial Firms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountingAudit committeeAuditInternal auditBusinessChief audit executiveJoint auditPublic relationsExternal auditorCharterPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * THE INCREASING FOCUS ON ETHICS HAS CREATED an opportunity for CPAs to help their companies foster a corporate culture that promotes ethical decision making. It also has encouraged more boards of directors to be involved with hiring internal audit and other accounting employees with financial reporting and control responsibilities. * CPAs NEED TO CONVEY THE CONCEPT OF AN ETHICAL corporate culture to a broad range of people including the board, management and other employees. They can do this by setting the tone and delivering the message that an ethical approach to decision making is important. * CPAs SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN DEVELOPING their company's audit committee charter by offering input on internal controls and oversight of the accounting and financial reporting processes. * NPOs AND PRIVATE COMPANIES ALSO ARE REEXAMINING their approach to ethics as states consider applying elements of Sarbanes-Oxley to these entities. Even though they aren't required to do so, a number of private companies are reviewing their ethics and compliance policies, especially those looking ahead to possible public offerings or sales to public companies. ********** To secure her position as director of internal controls and audit with Comfort Systems USA Inc., CPA Melissa Frazier met with most of the executive management team as well as with members of the board of directors' audit committee. audit committee hired me, she says. Officially, I report to them, although administratively I report to the CFO. As with many internal audit directors, Frazier's role includes helping the company's accounting staff members understand how ethics apply to their day-today responsibilities. Frazier's experience with the $785 million provider of commercial and industrial heating and ventilation systems isn't unique. Industry observers agree that because of their understanding of financial reporting and their view into operations, CPAs often are in the best position to take the lead in helping their companies develop a vigorous ethical culture. Thus many corporate boards--influenced by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002--are taking a more active role in ensuring companies implement and follow sound ethics policies. Given that most ethical dilemmas in the workplace have a clear financial dimension, board members now are more involved in hiring internal audit and other accounting employees. There has been, and will continue to be, increased interaction between the audit committee and an organization's financial people, says Curtis Verschoor, professor emeritus of accounting at DePaul University in Chicago. This article will show how the focus on ethical corporate behavior is affecting accountants in businesses as well as in not-for-profit organizations (NPOs). It also will review the changing relationship between accounting staff and boards of directors and identify some best practices CPAs can follow to foster a corporate culture that promotes ethical decision making. SURVEY SAYS... A 2004 survey by the Conference Board showed CPAs how the increased focus on corporate ethics is reshaping the responsibilities of corporate boards--and CPAs--in companies around the globe. The New York-based research organization published Ethics Programs--The Role of the Board: A Global Study in February 2004. The survey examined the activities of boards of directors at 165 companies in the United States, Canada, Great Britain, India, Japan and Western Europe. (For details on survey results, see Board's Pole in Ethics, page 72.) Several factors are behind the increased board involvement in ethics programs revealed in the survey. Clearly the shift is one result of the implosions at Enron, Adelphia Communications and other companies, as well as the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Any company listed on the New York Stock Exchange must comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley requirement that audit committees establish procedures to handle complaints concerning accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.009
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancySame topicRisk Management in Financial FirmsFrench-language works237,207