A Simulation Experimental Study on the Gas-Water Saturation Characteristics in the Process of Constant-Speed Gas Production Based on the Microscopic Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the important findings of research work that was undertaken on the residual water saturation of gas reservoirs that arises from the decrease in pore pressure during a constant-speed gas production process. To study the changes and distribution regularities of water-gas saturation, we used a micro-glass model to conduct a simulation study of the process of constant-speed gas production under pore pressures of 0.5 MPa, 1 MPa and 5 MPa. The results indicate that the total displacement power of the gas reservoir directly affects the development effect. The higher the pore pressures of the gas reservoir whose part of bound water may flow, the more difficult is the development of the reservoir due to the presence of more movable water, resulting in a poorer development effect. For a lower pore pressure of a gas reservoir, the bound water of the gas reservoir is generally immobile, that is, the gas production is single-phase gas seepage, resulting in an improved development effect. Implementing a reasonable development plan for a water-bearing gas reservoir with low permeability is clearly of great significance to ensure its effective development. Key words: Microscopic model; Constant speed; Gas production; Gas-water saturation; Variation characteristics; Simulation experiment
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".