Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses about the dream themes of Hughes and the developing stages of Hughes’ ideas about dreams. In Hughes’s early poems, he describes the individual’ dreams which are deferred. With the changes of social circumstances, in the late years of Langston Hughes, he advocates that dreams can’t be deferred, human beings need to have collective, utopian and global dreams to achieve a better world. Key words: dream, Hughes, development Collective Utopian Resume: L’article present discute les themes de reve dans la poesie de Hughes et le developpement d’idee de Hughes sur le reve. Dans ses premiers poemes, Hughes decrit les reves des individus qui sont remis. Avec le changement de la circonstance sociale, dans les dernieres annees de Langston Hughes, il preconise que les reves ne peuvent etre differes et que les etes humains ont besoin de collectifs, utopiques et globaux reves pour atteindre un monde meilleur. Mots-Cles: reve, Hughes, developpement collectif utopique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".