MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Level Structure of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>: Implications for the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>Astrophysical Reaction Rate and for the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>Mass

2005· article· lv· W182308770 on OpenAlexaff
D. Seweryniak, P. J. Woods, M. P. Carpenter, T. Davinson, R. V. F. Janssens, D. G. Jenkins, T. Lauritsen, C. J. Lister, C. Ruiz, J. Shergur, S. Sinha, A. Woehr

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsEnergy (signal processing)Sensitivity (control systems)Resonance (particle physics)ExcitationSpectroscopyAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The level structure of $^{22}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{g}$ has been studied with high-sensitivity $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray spectroscopy techniques. A complete level scheme is derived incorporating all subthreshold states and all levels in the energy region relevant for novae burning. The excitation energy of the most important astrophysical resonance is measured with improved accuracy and found to differ from previous values. Combining the present result with a recent resonance energy measurement of this state leads to a derived $^{22}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{g}$ mass excess of $\ensuremath{-}400.5(13)\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.012
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0120.011
Scholarly communication0.0110.012
Open science0.0150.014
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3280.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207