Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper begins from the analysis of the heroine Laura’s spiritual world to research the theme of Katherine Anne Porter’s short fiction “Flowering Judas”. It respectively analyzed the theme from two aspects: betrayal and struggling. Then this paper tries to comprehend author’s attitude towards life and to have a better understanding of women’s feminist conscious in the reality. Keywords: Katherine Anne Porter, “Flowering Judas”, theme, feminist conscious Resume Cet essai commence par l’analyse du monde spirituel de l’heroine Laura pour etudier le theme du roman Flowering Judas de Katherine Anne Porter. L’analyse s’effectue dans deux aspects : trahison et lutte. Ainsi, l’essai cherche a comprendre l’attitude de l’auteur a l’egard de la vie et a avoir une meilleure comprehension de la conscience feministe des femmes dans la realite. Mots-cles : Katherine Anne Porter, Flowering Judas, theme, conscience feministe 摘 要 本文從凱瑟琳•安•波特的短篇小說《開花的猶大樹》中女主人公勞拉的精神世界入手，分別從背叛與抗爭兩個方面對故事的主題進行了分析，試圖理解作者的人生態度，也對她表現出的女性的生存狀態和她們在面對殘酷現實時的女性意識有更深的認識。 關鍵詞：凱瑟琳•安•波特；《開花的猶大樹》；主題；女性意識
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".