La iniciativa internacional por el nacimiento MadreBebé: Un abordaje de la atención materna eficiente a la luz de los derechos humanos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo describe la historia, principios y los 10 pasos de la Iniciativa Internacional por el Nacimiento MadreBebé (IMBCI), creado por la Organización Internacional por el Nacimiento MadreBebe, lanzado en marzo de 2008. La IMBCI A iniciativa internacional pelo nascimento MãeBebê: Uma abordagem de um atendimento materno eficiente à luz dos direitos humanos1 The International MotherBaby Childbirth Initiative: A Human Rights Approach to Optimal Maternity Care La iniciativa internacional por el nacimiento MadreBebé: Un abordaje de la atención materna eficiente a la luz de los derechos humanos REFLEXÕES SOBRE HUMANIZAÇÃO E A REALIDADE DOS SERVIÇOS REFLECTIONS ON HUMANIZATION AND THE REALITY OF HEALTH SERVICES REFLEXIONES SOBRE LA HUMANIZACIÓN Y LA REALIDAD DE LOS SERVICIOS 94 // Rev Tempus Actas Saúde Col actualmente está desarrollando tres proyectos ilotos en hospitales de Quebec, Brasil y Austria y construye en varios países la Red MadreBebé (MBnets). Un componente critico de la IMBCI es destacar el hecho de que “los derechos de las mujeres y de los niños son derechos humanos” y que “el acceso a la salud humana e eficaz es un derecho humano básico”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".