MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1823969717 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2014-0009

Partial diel vertical migration of sympatric vendace (<i>Coregonus albula</i>) and Fontane cisco (<i>Coregonus fontanae</i>) is driven by density dependence

2014· article· en· W1823969717 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas Mehner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCisco Systems
KeywordsCoregonusDiel vertical migrationSympatric speciationPredationBiologyPiscivoreEcologyFisherySympatryPopulation densityPredatorZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>PopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have indicated that in fish populations performing diel vertical migrations (DVM), some individuals do not migrate but reflect a resident phenotype, a pattern named as partial DVM. I present data on fish densities and the proportion of residents in Lake Stechlin (Germany) as obtained by annual midwater trawling over four discrete depths during nighttime over 8 years. The lake is inhabited by the sympatric vendace (Coregonus albula) and Fontane cisco (Coregonus fontanae). The proportion of vendace residents increased with the density of vendace, whereas the proportion of Fontane cisco residents declined with increasing density, indicating that density plays a role in the migration patterns for both species, but in opposite directions. There were almost no differences in mean size, size-frequency distributions, or Fulton condition factor between resident or migrant parts of the populations in both species. However, the proportion of dry mass in wet mass, which indicates individual nutritional status, had a tendency to be lower in migrants than in residents in both species in the years 2011, 2012, and 2013. These data suggest that density dependence may be an important factor that modifies the proportion of residents in vertically migrating fish populations. In contrast, length-dependent predation vulnerability or systematic individual differences in nutritional status were not strongly supported as potential predictors of the proportion of residents. It needs to be discussed whether partial DVM is conceptually similar to partial seasonal migrations of fish, or whether DVM reflects variants of the ideal free distribution, which are inherently density-dependent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→