Investimento estrangeiro ou desenvolvimento? Comparando abordagens Brasileiras e Canadenses para a proteção do investimento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo compara as abordagens do Canadá e do Brasil na regulamentação do investimento estrangeiro. Apesar de terem uma estrutura econômica semelhante, os dois países têm percepções divergentes para a regulamentação do investimento estrangeiro direto, que foram moldadas por seus padrões de política externa de longo prazo. Enquanto o Canadá tende a promover um elevado nível de proteção dos investidores estrangeiros, o Brasil prefere defender a sua autonomia como parte de uma estratégia mais ampla do processo de industrialização liderado pelo estado. O artigo conclui sugerindo que o recente crescimento e desenvolvimento do Brasil pode levar a uma maior convergência na questão da regulação de investidores estrangeiros.Palavras-chaveBrasil; Canadá; política externa; autonomia política; investimento estrangeiro
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".