MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1824917713 · doi:10.14288/bcs.v0i61.1176

Teaching the Teachers: Establishment and Early Years of the B.C. Provincial Normal Schools

2010· article· en· W1824917713 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J Calam

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithLegislationNothingCertificationSuccessor cardinalPoliticsSociologyPolitical scienceLawPublic administrationTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In North America, supporters of public education express their faith in superlatives. Superintendent of Education Alexander Robinson proved no exception. When B.C.'s first Provincial Normal School opened at Vancouver High School in 1901, he rejoiced. It was, he declared, most important event in many years in the history of Education in this Province. Robinson had good reason for optimism. Up to his time, the 1872 Public Schools Act ruled all teachers subject to certification. But this legislation guaranteed nothing, since rigid observance would have closed a dozen schools for want of legally certified teachers. During the tenure of the first superintendent, John Jessop, qualified teachers came to B.C. from eastern Canada and Britain. Native or resident British Columbians could sit challenge examinations or periodically attend teachers' institutes. These were informal gatherings aimed at regularizing teaching methods. Under 1876 laws, moreover, minimal funds were generated in aid of pupil teachers to be trained in the Vancouver and Victoria High Schools. In Jessop's view, however, what was principally needed was a normal school like the one at Toronto from which he had graduated in !855. With Jessop removed through political contretemps in 1878, others took up the cause, justified in part by the assumption that it was possible to teach people how to teach. Superintendent C. C. Mackenzie believed this. He warned in 1885 that so long as B.C. had no normal school, it would falter under a defective education system. His successor, S. D. Pope, agreed. A normal school, he explained, was a wise economy. It would produce devoted, methodical teachers, an earnest band of workers equipped with ability to control. In the legislature, politicians 1 Superintendent of Education, Annual Report of the Public Schools of the Province of British Columbia [hereafter ARPS] (Victoria, B.C.: King's Printer, 1901), p. 227. 2 ARPS, 1885, p. 156. 3 ARPS, 1890, p. 128.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0350.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207