Targeted Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Continuous Rhythm Assessment With an Insertable Cardiac Monitor: The Rhythm Evaluation for Anticoagulation With Continuous Monitoring (REACT.COM) Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic anticoagulation is recommended for patients with AF and additional stroke risk factors, even during long periods of sinus rhythm. Continuous rhythm assessment with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) and use of rapid onset novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) allow for targeted anticoagulation only around an AF episode, potentially reducing bleeding complications without compromising stroke risk. METHODS: This multicenter, single-arm study enrolled patients on NOAC with nonpermanent AF and CHADS2 score 1 or 2. After a 60-day run-in with no AF episodes ≥ 1 hour, NOACs were discontinued but reinitiated for 30 days following any AF episode ≥ 1 hour diagnosed through daily ICM transmissions. Major endpoints included time on NOAC, stroke, and bleeding. RESULTS: Among 59 enrollees, 75% were male, age 67 ± 8 years, 76% paroxysmal AF, 69% had prior AF ablation, and mean CHADS2 score 1.3 ± 0.5. Over 466 ± 131 mean days of follow-up there were 24,004 ICM transmissions with a compliance rate of 98.7%. A total of 35 AF episodes ≥ 1 hour occurred in 18 (31%) patients, resulting in a total time on NOAC of 1,472 days. This represents a 94% reduction in the time on NOAC compared to chronic anticoagulation. There were three traumatic bleeds (all on aspirin), three potential transient ischemic attacks (all on aspirin with CHADS2 score of 1), and no strokes or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted strategy of ICM-guided intermittent NOAC administration is feasible. A large-scale trial is necessary to evaluate the safety of this approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".