MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1825478364 · doi:10.1109/pess.2001.970183

Current-source converter based SSSC: modeling and control

2001· article· en· W1825478364 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Ye, Mehrdad Kazerani, V.H. Quintana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage sourceVoltageAC powerControl theory (sociology)Transmission lineWaveformMaximum power transfer theoremReactanceController (irrigation)Current sourceComputer scienceCapacitive sensingElectric power transmissionPower (physics)Electronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The static synchronous series compensator (SSSC) is a series connected FACTS controller, which is capable of providing reactive power compensation to a power system. The output of an SSSC is a series injected AC voltage, which leads or lags the line current by 90/spl deg/, thus emulating a controllable inductive or capacitive reactance. SSSC can be used to reduce the equivalent line impedance and thus enhance the active power transfer capability, of the transmission line. SSSC is conventionally realized with a voltage-source converter. In this paper, an SSSC based on the current-source converter topology is proposed. In this structure, the DC-side current is regulated to a value larger than the peak value of the maximum line current. The injected voltage is controlled according to the desired reactive power compensation. The decoupled state-feedback control for the injected voltage with a separated DC current control is applied to the proposed system. The advantages:of the proposed scheme include fast dynamic response and high quality of current and voltage waveforms. The proposed SSSC has been simulated using the PSCAD/EMTDC package. The simulation results show that excellent current and voltage waveforms as well as very short response times can be obtained while operating at a low switching frequency. This makes the proposed scheme suitable for high power applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207