Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary form only given. Power plant governing response is the prompt automatic increase in generation in response to decreases of system frequency. This governing response, also called primary frequency regulation, acts to preserve the balance between generation and load across the interconnected power system; it provides tight frequency control within 2 to 3 seconds after trips of units. Power plant governing response, the change in generation normalized by the change in frequency, has units of MW/Hz; it is commonly expressed in the US and Canada as MW per 0.1 Hz. Both power system operating and planning personnel have become increasingly aware of the fact that power plant governing response is considerably less than expected and planned for. This difference, "the governing problem" is seen after abrupt changes in generation or served load; the sustained component of the simulated response of system frequency is much closer to 60 Hertz than the recorded response. This presentation presents recordings of unit and interconnection response to events that illustrate: the nature of the governing problem from an interconnection view; individual unit responses, which suggest classes of nonresponsiveness; and results of simulations compared to recordings of the same events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".