La contribution de la Francophonie mondiale au démantèlement du Canada français ou l’évolution du mouvement Richelieu (1944-1982)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article souligne la contribution de la Francophonie mondiale au démantèlement du projet national canadien-français entre les années 1950 et 1980. L’auteur reconnaît que le projet canadien-français continental s’est progressivement effrité non seulement à cause du ralentissement des migrations hors Québec, de l’intervention croissante de l’État, du néonationalisme québécois et du fédéralisme renouvelé, mais aussi parce que le projet mondial émergent de la Francophonie a, pendant ces mêmes années, marqué l’esprit des Canadiens français. L’évolution du mouvement Richelieu en constitue un parfait exemple. La mutation d’un organisme canadien-français en organisme francophone mondial à partir de la fin de la décennie 1960 rappelle dans quelle mesure ce nouvel échelon de solidarité a rassemblé des gens de différents continents, qui se sont progressivement ralliés à un projet et à une identité « francophones » au détriment d’un projet national plus restreint comme celui du Canada français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".