MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1826283962 · doi:10.1109/pq.1998.710360

Variable structure control of four pole voltage source inverter for active filtering of nonlinear loads in 3-phase 4-wire systems

2002· article· en· W1826283962 on OpenAlexaff
Bhim Singh, Anuradha Anuradha, D. P. Kothari, Ambrish Chandra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Three-phaseActive filterVoltage sourceTotal harmonic distortionPulse-width modulationAC powerEngineeringHarmonicInverterHarmonicsVoltageElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the analysis of four leg voltage source inverter (VSI) used as an active filter (AF) for reactive power compensation, load balancing, harmonic elimination and neutral current compensation in three-phase four-wire nonlinear loads. Variable structure control (VSC) of the average DC bus capacitor of the AF is employed. A hysteresis rule based carrierless pulse width modulation (PWM) current control scheme is employed to generate the gating signals to the switching devices of the active filter. A set of three single-phase diode bridge rectifiers feeding a resistive-capacitive load is used for nonlinear loads on three-phase four-wire power systems. The merits of the proposed method of control are: (1) less complex and reliable active filter configuration; (2) fast controller action; (3) negligible transients in the DC bus voltage of the active filter at the time of instant load changes; (4) gradual convergence of controlled supply currents to new steady state values at the occurrence of abrupt load changes; (5) total harmonic distortion (THD) of the compensated load has been brought well below the standard harmonic specification IEEE-519 limit; (6) neutral current is reduced below 1%; and (7) simultaneous balancing of unbalanced loads. Simulated results confirm the validity of the proposed approach for three-phase (12.5 kW)/two-phase (8.3 kW)/single-phase (4.2 kW) nonlinear loads. The suggested method is expected to be widely used in future for active power filter designs produced for load compensation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207