Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le canon 1063 envisage un soin pastoral a la preparation au mariage qui commence a l'enfance et se continue pendant toute une vie. L'article explore comment l'Eglise devrait aborder le soin pastoral au mariage, en commencant avec l'etude de la preparation au mariage telle que presentee dans le Code de 1917, puisque c'est a la lumiere de ce canon que la nouveaute du canon 1063 peut etre appreciee. Le canon est examine en procedant a une serie de questions et de reponses soulevees par le canon lui-meme. Par exemple: qui est responsable du soin pastoral a la celebration du mariage? Quelle est la nature de l'obligation pour ceux qui en sont responsables? Et quand et comment doit-on remplir cette obligation? Les reponses sont donnees par le moyen d'une recherche sur les normes et les politiques en matiere de preparation au mariage en Irlande, en Coree, et avec une reference speciale a l'Espagne et aux Etats-Unis. Quelques questions et difficultes canoniques rattachees au soin pastoral a la celebration du mariage sont ensuite revues, telles que la foi et la preparation au mariage, les cours de preparation au mariage et le droit au mariage dans l'Eglise, ainsi que le statut juridique de ces directives et politiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".