MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1826590371 · doi:10.1189/jlb.68.1.104

Ligand activation of nerve growth factor receptor TrkA protects monocytes from apoptosis

2000· article· en· W1826590371 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Sala, Silvia Corinti, Monica Federici, H. Uri Saragovi, Giampiero Girolomoni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leukocyte Biology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroIstituto Superiore di Sanità
KeywordsNerve growth factorBiologyCD80Cell biologyTropomyosin receptor kinase ACD86MonocyteReceptorLow-affinity nerve growth factor receptorDendritic cellImmune systemCD40ImmunologyT cellIn vitroCytotoxic T cellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nerve growth factor (NGF) receptors are expressed in different cell types outside the nervous system, and increasing evidence indicates that NGF can act as a regulatory molecule during inflammatory and immune responses. In this study, we show that triggering of the high-affinity NGF receptor TrkA with agonists protects monocytes from apoptosis induced by gliotoxin or UVB radiation. TrkA stimulation up-regulates the expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Bfl-1. On the other hand, TrkA stimulation does not change the expression of MHC, CD80, CD86, CD40, and CD54 molecules, nor the antigen-presenting function of monocytes. In addition, during in vitro monocyte to dendritic cell differentiation TrkA expression is progressively lost, suggesting that NGF selectively affects monocyte but not dendritic cell survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leukocyte BiologySame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207