Research on Model of Harmony Sustainable Development between ECS and SRS： from Perspective of Resource Entropy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combining the theory of dissipative structure systems, resource entropy and stakeholder, the article gave the definition of Stakeholder Resource System (SRS), analyzed sustainable development model of Enterprise Complex System (ESC) from the perspective of resource entropy, as well as sustainable development model of stakeholder resource system. Finally, based on the above analysis, the article studied Harmony Sustainable Development model of ECS and SRS. Key words: Stakeholder Resource System; Enterprise Complex System; Resource Entropy; Harmony Sustainable Development Resume: En combinant la theorie du systeme de structure dissipative, l'entropie des ressources et les intervenants, l'article a donne une definition du systeme des ressources des intervenants(SRS), analyse a la fois des modeles de developpement durable du systeme complexe de l'entreprise(CES) du point de vue de l'entropie des ressources et des modeles de developpement durable du systeme des ressources des parties prenantes. Enfin, a part l'analyse ci-dessus, l'article a etudie egalement le modele du developpement durable harmonieux d'ECS et de SRS. Mots-Cles: systeme des ressources des intervenants, systeme complexe de l’entreprise, entropie des ressources, developpement durable harmonieux
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".