MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Examining Biliary Acid Constituents among Gall Bladder Patients: A Bayes Study Using the Generalized Linear Model

2015· article· en· W1826791789 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Puja Makkar, S.K. Upadhyay, Vijay K. Shukla, R. S. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayes' theoremMathematicsGallstonesSet (abstract data type)Class (philosophy)Flexibility (engineering)Data setPrior probabilityStatisticsInternal medicineMedicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The generalized linear model is an important class of models that has wide variety of applications mainly because of its inherent flexibility and generality. The present paper provides an important application of GLM in order to examine different constituents of bile acid in the development of gallstones as well as carcinoma among the gallbladder patients. These constituents may be broadly categorized as primary and secondary bile acids. The paper, in fact, considers two particular cases of GLM based on normal and gamma modelling assumptions and provides the complete Bayes analysis using independent but vague priors for the concerned model parameters. It then analyzes a real data set taken from SS Hospital, Banaras Hindu University, with primary (secondary) bile acids as response variables and secondary (primary) bile acids as the predictors. The authenticity of the assumed models for the given data set is also examined based on predictive simulation ideas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.386
GPT teacher head0.533
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchSame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207