Selecting an initial condition for normal form analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In normal form (NF) analysis, the nonlinear dynamical system being analyzed is modeled with nonlinearities. If the second order NF is used in the analysis, the nonlinearities only up to second order are modeled. Due to the presence of nonlinearities in the model, the results of second order NF analysis is dependent in the initial conditions [C.-M. Lin et al., May 1996] [S. Zhu et al., November 2001]. If the state of the power system with respect to the stable equilibrium point (SEP), /spl Delta/X/spl Delta//sub 0/, at the instant of removal of the fault is used as an initial condition, then NF analysis may fail to give correct results. It is shown in this paper that the initial condition must be chosen such that the two main assumptions made in NF analysis are met. If the system being studied is stable, the post fault system will eventually reach the SEP. We propose to select an initial condition at an instant subsequent to clearing a fault, to achieve more reliable results from the NF analysis. The time domain simulations are presented to support the analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".