MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Factors Effecting Social Participation Amongst Iranian Older Adults

2012· article· en· W1827106082 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bagheri Masoumeh, Abdolrahim Asadollahi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFatalismReligiositySocioeconomic statusSocial engagementSociologyPolitical sciencePopulationSocioeconomicsHumanitiesPsychologySocial psychologySocial scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A problematic reduction of social participation in local communities of Khuzistan province in the southwest of Iran has became a serious issue for research in social planning and policy making. It has occasioned an attempt to search for risk factors as deterrents to social participation. The aim of this study was to investigate factors effecting social participation among gray citizens, focusing on the role of their religiosity as reducer or actives factor. A statistic community aged were 60-80 years old of 63 seniors citizens from municipal zones of Ahwaz city that selected through random sampling method. Gender, socioeconomic status, membership in non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Duration of living in the city, a sense of satisfaction towards urban services, and traditionalism/fatalism. It was noticeable that religiosity has no significant relationship with social participation of aging citizens; though religious elders have less participating interactions in this study. Finally, some discussions and offers within the research itself were recognized as potential improvement and reinforcement energies toward participative planning within the population, especially among women and seniors. The resulting development of social networks and societal links, along with some revival of social trust appeared helpful. Key words: Religiosity; Social Participation; Socioeconomic status; Fatalism Resume Une reduction problematique de la participation sociale dans les communautes locales de la province du Khouzistan dans le sud-ouest de l’Iran est devenu un grave probleme pour la recherche en matiere de planification sociale et l’elaboration des politiques. Il a occasionne une tentative pour rechercher les facteurs de risque comme moyens de dissuasion a la participation sociale. Le but de cette etude etait d’etudier les facteurs effectuer la participation sociale des citoyens gris, en se concentrant sur le role de leur religiosite comme reducteur ou un facteur actifs. Une communaute statistique ans etaient 60-80 ans, de citoyens aines de 63 zones municipales de la ville d’Ahwaz qui ont choisi par la methode d’echantillonnage aleatoire. Sexe, statut socioeconomique, l’appartenance a des organisations non gouvernementales (ONG), Duree de vie dans la ville, un sentiment de satisfaction a l’egard des services urbains, et le traditionalisme / fatalisme. On a pu remarquer que la religiosite n’a pas de relation significative avec la participation sociale des citoyens vieillissants; si les chefs religieux ont moins d’interactions qui participent a cette etude. Enfin, des discussions et des offres au sein de la recherche elle-meme ont ete reconnues comme susceptibles d’etre ameliores et les energies de renfort vers la planification participative au sein de la population, surtout parmi les femmes et les personnes âgees. Le developpement resultant des reseaux sociaux et societaux des liens, avec une certaine reprise de la confiance sociale semble utile. Mots cles: La religiosite; La participation sociale; Statut socio-economique; Le fatalisme

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social science→Same topicHealth disparities and outcomes→French-language works237,207→