MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1827138354 · doi:10.1109/pica.2001.932337

SCADA EMS DMS-a part of the corporate IT system

2002· article· en· W1827138354 on OpenAlexaff
L. Grasberg, Lise-Lotte Österlund

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsATS Automation Tooling Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSCADAFlexibility (engineering)Computer scienceIncentiveCost reductionRisk analysis (engineering)Openness to experienceInformation exchangeSystems engineeringComputer securityProcess managementTelecommunicationsBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The static world with a closed control room within the utility industry is changing to an environment where the SCADA/EMS/DMS system is part of the corporate IT systems. The driving force for this is the need for utilities to have accurate data available for quick business decisions on a deregulated market. Cost reduction and quality improvement facilitated by increased information exchange is a strong incentive for utilities to require open system enabling integration. Constantly changing requirements force the utility industry to establish communication between new combinations of systems and changing sets of applications within a system. This results in new requirements on flexibility and openness for systems and applications. To meet these new requirements the solutions from the SCADA/EMS/DMS vendors is to adopt new technology that makes the systems more flexible and enable sharing of information in a fast and efficient way. This paper discusses the general requirements and trends and new SCADA/EMS/DMS solutions that will meet the customer requirements and aspects on delivery and system upgrades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.134 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207