<scp>IASSIDD A</scp>cademy on <scp>E</scp>ducation, <scp>T</scp>eaching, and <scp>R</scp>esearch: The Genesis and Evolution of an Idea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The author provides an overview of the development of the IASSIDD A cademy from its inception to D ecember 2013. The commentary represents the personal reflections of the founding director of the A cademy in terms of its mission and its history of carrying out activities around the world. Outlined are some of the challenges and successes, as well as some of the future needs in terms of the A cademy's relevance both inside and beyond IASSIDD . The author notes that with the formation of a board of directors, the development of IASSIDD A cademy bylaws along with mission statements, and the design and work with various agencies and communities around the world, the A cademy has now moved into a period of consolidation and renewed progress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.696 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".