Cellular activation patterns of the main olfactory bulb and accessory olfactory bulb following exposure to beddings soiled by same- or opposite-sex conspecifics in Mandarin voles (<i>Microtus mandarinus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using induction of Fos as an index, we studied cellular activation patterns in the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) and main olfactory bulb (MOB) of Mandarin voles ( Microtus mandarinus (Milne-Edwards, 1871)) following their exposure to beddings soiled by different sexes. Male and female Mandarin voles that were exposed to beddings soiled by the opposite sex produced significantly more Fos-immunoreactive (Fos-ir) neurons in the anterior portion of the AOB and significantly fewer Fos-ir neurons in the posterior portion of the AOB than voles exposed to beddings soiled by the same sex. Furthermore, male and female Mandarin voles exposed to bedding soiled by different sex produced different numbers of Fos-ir cells in MOB. Mandarin voles exposed to beddings soiled by the opposite sex produced significantly more Fos-ir neurons in MOB than voles exposed to beddings soiled by the same sex. Our results establish that Mandarin voles of each sex showed different cellular activation patterns in AOB and MOB following exposures to sex-specific beddings. We suggest that both AOB and MOB were involved in sexual activities induced by chemosensory signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".