The 617 MHz–λ 850 μm correlation (cosmic rays and cold dust) in NGC 3044 and NGC 4157
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the first maps of NGC 3044 and NGC 4157 at λ 450 μm and λ 850 μm from the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope as well as the first maps at 617 MHz from the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope. High-latitude emission has been detected in both the radio continuum and sub-mm for NGC 3044 and in the radio continuum for NGC 4157, including several new features. For NGC 3044, in addition, we find 617 MHz emission extending to the north of the major axis, beginning at the far ends of the major axis. One of these low-intensity features, more than 10 kpc from the major axis, has apparently associated emission at λ 20 cm and may be a result of in-disc activity related to star formation. The dust spectrum at long wavelengths required fitting with a two-temperature model for both galaxies, implying the presence of cold dust (Tc = 9.5 K for NGC 3044 and Tc = 15.3 K for NGC 4157). Dust masses are Md = 1.6 × 108 M⊙ and Md = 2.1 × 107 M⊙ for NGC 3044 and NGC 4157, respectively, and are dominated by the cold component. There is a clear correlation between the 617 MHz and λ 850 μm emission in the two galaxies. In the case of NGC 3044 for which the λ 850 μm data are strongly dominated by cold dust, this implies a relation between the non-thermal synchrotron emission and cold dust. The 617 MHz component represents an integration of massive star formation over the past 107–8 yr and the λ 850 μm emission represents heating from the diffuse interstellar radiation field (ISRF). The 617 MHz–λ 850 μm correlation improves when a smoothing kernel is applied to the λ 850 μm data to account for differences between the cosmic ray (CR) electron diffusion scale and the mean free path of an ISRF photon to dust. The best-fitting relation is |$L_{617_{\rm MHz}}\,\propto \,{L_{850\mu {\rm m}}}^{2.1\,\pm \,0.2}$| for NGC 3044. If variations in the cold dust emissivity are dominated by variations in dust density, and the synchrotron emission depends on magnetic field strength (a function of gas density) as well as CR electron generation (a function of massive star formation rate and therefore density via the Schmidt law) then the expected correlation for NGC 3044 is |$L_{617_{\rm MHz}}\,\propto \,{L_{850\mu {\rm m}}}^{2.2}$|, in agreement with the observed correlation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".