MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1827666052 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2002.1011449

High-order tunable passive digital filters

2003· article· en· W1827666052 on OpenAlexaff
Hon Keung Kwan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-pass filterCenter frequencyPrototype filterCutoff frequencyHigh-pass filterBand-pass filterBandwidth (computing)PassbandDigital filterm-derived filterHalf-band filterComputationFilter (signal processing)Transformation (genetics)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringAcousticsPhysicsAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, high-order tunable low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, and band-stop passive digital filters for realtime sharp cutoff filtering applications is introduced. An analytical expression for each of the coefficients of the first-order and the second-order passive digital filter sections after low-pass to low-pass/high-pass frequency transformation has been derived. For the low-pass to band-pass/band-stop frequency transformation, an analytical expression for each of the coefficients of the second-order and the decomposed second-order passive digital filter sections has also been derived. These analytical expressions facilitate the real-time computation of all the required filter coefficients, from any specified new cutoff frequency for the low-pass/high-pass case, and from any specified new center frequency and/or new bandwidth for the band-pass/band-stop case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207