Intersubjectivity:The Best Congenial Stock to Link the Western Thoughts with the Chinese Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theory of intersubjectivity is the development of the Western ideologies in modern times. It derives from subjectivity and it is the transcendence over subjectivity. Rather than as a theory of philosophy or aesthetics, it had been a concept and methodology infiltrating through the Chinese aesthetic practices, social concepts and culture. This thesis probes into the possibility of combining the Chinese culture and the Western thoughts by analyzing intersubjectivity embodied in the Chinese philosophy, social and political thoughts and the Chinese literary and art thoughts, thereby, proving that intersubjectivity is the best congenial stock to link the Western thoughts with the Chinese culture. Keywords: Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity, Epistemology, the Moral Philosophy Resume: Theorie d’interactivite de sujet, le developpement modern des idees de theorie d’interactivite de sujet, prend sa source dans la nature de sujet et la passe. En Chine, l’interactivite de sujet ne se pose pas comme une theorie dans les domaines de philosophie ou esthetique, mais elle s’est infiltree dans les idees sociales et esthetiques chinoises. Cet article se presente l’interactivite a travers des idees de philosophique, societe, politique et litterature chinoise, et il se presente la possibilite de la combinassions et la point de depart -----interactivite de sujet. Mots-cles: Subjectivite, intersubjectivite, epistemologie, la philosophie morale
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".