MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Magnetism and Disorder Effects on Muon Spin Rotation Measurements of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Iron-Arsenic Superconductors

2011· article· en· W1828199421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsMuon spin spectroscopySuperconductivityMagnetismPenetration depthVortexMagnetic fieldMuonLondon penetration depthLattice (music)PhysicsFerromagnetismArsenicMaterials scienceNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown that attempts to accurately deduce the magnetic penetration depth $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ of overdoped ${\mathrm{BaFe}}_{1.82}{\mathrm{Co}}_{0.18}{\mathrm{As}}_{2}$ single crystals by transverse-field muon spin rotation (TF $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$) are thwarted by field-induced magnetic order and strong vortex-lattice disorder. We explain how substantial deviations from the magnetic field distribution of a nearly perfect vortex lattice by one or both of these factors is also significant for other iron-arsenic superconductors, and this introduces considerable uncertainty in the values of $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ obtained by TF $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it