MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1828201421

Nonlinear model for the isotropic/smectic a phase transition

2007· article· en· W1828201421 on OpenAlexaff
Nasser Mohieddin Abukhdeir, Alejandro D. Rey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Control Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotropyPhase diagramPhenomenological modelPhase transitionNonlinear systemLiquid crystalStatistical physicsPhase (matter)Materials scienceMathematicsThermodynamicsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsOpticsQuantum mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present both solution and coefficient determination methods for a Landau-de Gennes type phenomenological phase transition model. A homogeneous-volume form of the model is analyzed and shown to be valid for the isotropic/smectic-A transition sequence. A method is presented for the direct linking to experimental observations through coefficient determination in the form of a nonlinear programming problem. A minimization analysis is utilized to simplify the nonlinear model. A computationally efficient and deterministic phase diagram generation method is presented based upon the single-variable form of the model. Phenomenological coefficients and the resulting phase diagram for the liquid crystal 12CB (dodecylcyanobiphenyl) are presented and compared to experimental data. The results show good agreement with experimental data, validating the coefficient determination method. In addition to this the determined constants are applicable for use in the full heterogeneous form of the model. Extensions to the simulation of free-standing smectic films are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Control ApplicationsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207