Masculinización y virilización de la escritura de la mujer de vanguardia: el caso de Estación. Ida y Vuelta y El Personaje Presentido
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo examina los diferentes procesos por los que la escritora española se enfrenta al mundo masculino del periodo de las vanguardias y cómo lucha por formar parte del movimiento literario de vanguardias. En primer lugar, analizo la figura de Rosa Chacel, una de las pocas escritoras consideradas por el canon literario masculino de la época, y su novela Estación. Ida y Vuelta (1930). Seguidamente, estudio el caso de Concha Méndez, una de las figuras más olvidadas de todas las modernas, y su obra teatral El personaje presentido (1931). La elección de estas dos obras remite al hecho de que cada una de ellas recurren dos mecanismos diferentes para establecer una filiación con este movimiento. Mientras que Chacel plasma en su novela su gran capacidad intelectual y literaria a través de una voz narrativa que sufre un proceso de masculinización, la obra teatral de Méndez es una clara expresión de la mujer moderna que subvierte el modelo patriarcal de femineidad y adopta una imagen más virilizada de la mujer. This paper examines the various processes by which the Spanish female writer faces the male world of the avant-garde period and how they struggle to join its literary movement. First, I analyze the figure of Rosa Chacel, one of the few female writers considered by the (male) literary canon of the time, and her novel Estación. Ida y Vuelta (1930). Next, I study the case of Concha Méndez, one of the most neglected “modernas”, and her play El personaje presentido (1931). The choice of these two writers and their works refers to the fact that each draw different mechanisms to establish an affiliation with the cultural movement. While Chacel´s novel illustrates her great literary and intellectual capacity through a narrative voice that undergoes a process of masculinization, Méndez´s play is a clear expression of the modern woman who subverts the patriarchal model of femininity and takes a more “virile” picture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".