MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1828379434 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2014-0031

Accurate spectroscopic calculations on the X<sup>2</sup>Σ <sup>+</sup>, A<sup>2</sup>Π, and 2<sup>2</sup>Σ <sup>+</sup> electronic states of the BeAr<sup>+</sup> cation including spin-orbit coupling

2014· article· en· W1828379434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xianghong Niu, Wen Wen Shan, Shuai Wang, De Heng Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAtomic physicsComplete active spaceHamiltonian (control theory)Valence (chemistry)DipoleConfiguration interactionPhysicsElectronQuantum mechanicsExcited stateAtomic orbital

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complete active space self-consistent field/internally contracted multireference configuration interaction calculations with the correlation-consistent basis sets have been made to characterize all of the states of BeAr+ cation, which are attributed to the first two dissociation channels. The effect on the potential energy curves by Davidson correction, core-valence correlation, and scalar relativistic corrections is included. The spin-orbit coupling effect is taken into account by the state interaction method with the Breit–Pauli Hamiltonian. Our calculations can provide some useful guidelines for the future experimental work of band system 22[Formula: see text]+1/2-X2[Formula: see text]+1/2. For the first time, the transition properties including Franck−Condon factors and transition dipole moments have been derived for all of the Ω states. Some transition probabilities and radiative lifetimes have been estimated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207