MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1829004877 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2006.1693137

A Multifeature Voiced/Unvoiced Decision Algorithm for Noisy Speech

2006· article· en· W1829004877 on OpenAlexaff
Celia Shahnaz, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoiceSpeech recognitionEnergy (signal processing)Feature (linguistics)Computer scienceFrame (networking)SIGNAL (programming language)Speech enhancementSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Noise (video)HarmonicAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsAcousticsNoise reductionPhysicsStatisticsTelecommunicationsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new algorithm for the voiced/unvoiced (V/UV) decision of noise-corrupted speech. A speech periodicity-harmonic function (SPHF) is proposed to manifest distinctive characteristics between voiced and unvoiced regions. A composite feature vector is developed by combining a periodicity measure obtained from the SPHF with some energy measures such as zero-crossing rate-weighted RMS energy, Kaiser-Teager frame energy and the normalized low-frequency energy ratio. Unlike the conventional hard threshold, a signal-dependent initial-threshold (SDIT) for each feature is determined based on its statistical properties. The SDIT is exploited to develop a logical expression that returns an objective score regarding V/UV region. Additional voicing criteria are introduced to remove the artifacts that may exist due to the overlapping between decision regions. Simulation results of the proposed multifeature classification scheme, using the Keele reference database, show superior efficacy at a low SNR relative to some of the existing V/UV decision algorithms

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207