Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chourmo, le second volume de la trilogie de Fabio Montale, est une refondation du mythe fondateur de Gyptis et Protis, représentation privilégiée de Marseille d’après laquelle le roman recrée un espace d’invention singulière de la mémoire collective phocéenne. Tel que l’oeuvre de Jean-Claude Izzo le réinterprète et le reformule, le mythe apparaît dans une version déceptive qui montre que sa légende est en panne dans la Marseille du milieu des années 1990. Moment mythique de la fondation de la ville, récit constitutif d’une mémoire et d’une identité multiculturelle chevillée à un imaginaire méditerranéen particulier, le mythe de Gyptis et Protis est le récit légendaire de Marseille que le roman de Jean-Claude Izzo convoque comme un sous-texte et qu’il passe au crible de sa propre désillusion contemporaine pour donner forme à sa représentation de la ville. Étudier la dimension discursive, cognitive, générique, poétique et narrative de ce recours à la légende et à son imaginaire mythologique dans Chourmo est l’objet de cet article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".