MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1829432249 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1994.389344

Application of vector quantized hidden Markov modeling to telephone network based connected digit recognition

2002· article· en· W1829432249 on OpenAlexaff
E.R. Buhrke, R. Cardin, Yves Normandin, M. Rahim, J. Wilpon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodebookHidden Markov modelSpeech recognitionTelephone networkComputer scienceTelephonyPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMarkov modelMarkov chainMachine learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connected digit speech recognition in the telephone network is becoming increasingly more important as the demand for speech technology becomes widespread. In the past few years, several highly successful techniques for recognizing spoken connected digit strings have been proposed. Although these techniques have been applied to non-telephone based speech [e.g. Texas Instruments database], they have produced high recognition performance. Further, similar levels of performances have been demonstrated using discrete density and continuous density based hidden Markov models (HMMs). The success of the vector quantized (VQ) modeling approach, in particular, is encouraging and rather important from the viewpoint of computational efficiency. This paper presents a study of connected digit recognition on telephone network based data using VQ HMMs. We investigate several factors affecting the error rate of VQ HMMs-such as maximum mutual information (MMI) training, sender modeling, and codebook size-and measure their contributions to recognition accuracy. The model architecture, number of states and transitions, is also optimized and its contribution to overall performance discussed.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207