Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyomino Venn (or polyVenn) diagrams are Venn diagrams whose curves are the perimeters of orthogonal polyominoes drawn on the integer lattice. Minimum area polyVenn diagrams are those in which each of the 2n intersection regions, in a diagram of n polyominoes, consists of exactly one unit square. We construct minimum area polyVenn diagrams in bounding rectangles of size 2r×2c whenever r, c ≥ 2. Our construction is inductive, and depends on two expansionresults. First, a minimum area polyVenn diagram in a 2r×2c rectangle can be expanded to produce another that fits into a 2r+1×2c+1 rectangle. Second, a minimum area polyVenn in a 22×2c rectangle can be expanded to produce another that fits into a 22×2c+3 bounding rectangle. Finally, for even n we construct n-set polyVenn diagrams in bounding rectangles of size (2n/2-1)×(2n/2+1) in which the empty set is not represented as a unit square.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".